The Structure of Valuation

Becoming A Values Architect

Authors

  • David Mefford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v6i.119

Keywords:

value theory, set theory, subjective valuation, formal axiology

Abstract

This discussion addresses issues concerning the formalism of a scientific axiology and its applications to value with emphasis on subjective valuation. I comment on some of the recent articles and books by Rem B. Edwards, Gary Gallopin, Cliff Hurst, and Mark Moore, from a group of writers who present the best known representations of the math or logic structure intended to ground the formal aspects of Robert S. Hartman’s scientific axiology. In this essay, I discuss four major issues from my own perspective. 1. Sets and especially very large sets are subject to partitioning; 2. The richest value formation is [I > E > S] for objective value, but, for valuation it is [I = E = S], where the “I” superscript is a notation of holistic emphasis in the process of valuation by a human mind; 3. The axiological frame of reference for valuation must include emotional conditioning habits with room for change through experience and education; and 4. I redesigned the frame of reference for axiological value to a process of value enrichment in valuation, as developed in the Meta Axiological Pattern (known as the MIND MAP), first published in my dissertation. I end the discussion with my own approach, first made clear to me by Dr. Roy Cebik, a member of my dissertation committee. I summarize my own method to ground and explain the valuation side of the science of value, based on the notion of meaning emphasis which is based on an asymptotic structure. The import of the asymptotic structure is that people will take just a few confirmed properties or points from one or more axiological dimensions and ignore all the other properties and these may be connected with an asymptotic curve. This may help to explain why individual persons are the richest, highest value, yet we can go to war labeling some persons as enemies and kill them. I attempt to show that the structure of meaning emphasis best illuminates the structure of valuation. I close the discussion with a case showing the potential work of a values architect in business and in life. I characterize this essay with a quote from a currently popular Delta Airlines advertisement, “We highly praise those who have gone before us, but we cannot create the future by clinging to the past.”

References

Bodine, Paul and Hilty, Jack. Business Architecture: An Emerging Profession, Business Architects Association Institute, 2009.

Cantor, Georg. Mengenlehre (English: Set Theory), Einführung in die Mengenlehre: Die Mengenlehre Georg Cantor’s und ihre Axiomatisierung durch Ernst Zermelo. Berlin: Springer-Lehrbuch, 2009.

Cohen, Paul J. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, 1966, W. J. Benjamin, Inc., revised edition, Paul J. Cohen, Dover Press, 2008.

Edwards, Rem B. The Essentials of Formal Axiology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2010.

Gallopin, Gary. “The Baby or the Bathwater? The Role of Transfinite Mathematics in the Nascent Hartman Science.” Journal of Formal Axiology, 5, 2012, 131-155.

Gamov, George. One Two Three . . . Infinity: Facts and Speculations of Science. New York: Viking Press, 1961.

Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge and Discourse on Language, Great Britain: Tavistock Publications Limited, 1972.

Forrest, Frank. Ethics for the 21st Century, Rodopi Press, 1995.

Hartman, Robert S. Class discussion on Hartman’s HVP Manual of Interpretation. University of Tennessee, 1969.

Hartman, Robert S. The Structure of Value: Foundations for a Scientific Axiology, Southern Illinois University Press, 1967.

Hartman, Robert S. HVP Manual of Interpretation, Research Concepts, 1969.

Hartman, Robert S. What Is Value? Keynote Speech at Berkeley University, 1972.

Hurst, Cliff, “The Non-Mathematical Logic of a Science of Value.” The Journal of Formal Axiology, 5, 2012, 1-12.

Husserl, Edmund, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970

Husserl, Edmund. Formal and Transcendental Logic. The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1969.

Mefford, David. 50 Easy Pieces in Applied Formal Axiology, Self-published, 2012.

Mefford, David. The Knowledge of Good and Axiological Science, Spanish Translation, The University of the State of Mexico, 2012.

Mefford, David. Phenomenology of Man as a Valuing Subject, Dissertation for the Ph.D. degree, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1989.

Mefford, David. Values for Living the Good Life, Self-published, 2011.

Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1903.

Moore, Mark, “A Quantum Wave Model of Value Theory.” In Rem B. Edwards, ed., Formal Axiology and Its Critics. Amsterdam – Atlanta: Rodopi, 1995, 171-215.

Nietzsche, Fredrick. Beyond Good and Evil / On the Genealogy of Morality. In The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 8, 2014.

Russell, Bertrand and Whitehead, Alfred North, Principia Mathematica, Rough Draft Printing, 2011.

Short, Robert L., Presentation to the Robert S. Hartman Institute, 2008.

Zuchermann, Martin, Sets and Transfinite Numbers, Collier Macmillan Ltd, 1974.

Published

2013-07-01

How to Cite

Mefford, D. (2013). The Structure of Valuation: Becoming A Values Architect. Journal of Formal Axiology: Theory and Practice, 6, 109–131. https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v6i.119

Issue

Section

Discussions