Innovation

An Axiological and OD Exploration

Authors

  • K. T. Connor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v2i.17

Keywords:

formal axiology, innovation, organizational development

Abstract

Turbulent times require organizations that are open to innovation. Axiological thinking and measurement can contribute much to the development of an innovative climate. Climate development in organizations is a complex problem: there is no one answer in the "back of the book." The first step in complex problem solving is fact-finding. Until one is in possession of clear, relevant facts, the issues to address will themselves be unclear. Axiology provides just this clarity and relevance. In analyzing organizational climate, three myths must be addressed. There is, first of all, not a necessary congruence between what is communicated in an organization and what is actually internalized. Secondly, innovation is not a simple concept that means the same thing to all. Third, self-report measures are not always the best way to ascertain an organization's belief system and attitudes. Axiometric methodology takes these assumptions into account and provides a data-rich way to address an organization's approach to innovation. Analysis of perceived and desired reality in an organization is a key factor in this process. Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Systemic dimensions of desired and real states can give a clear picture of the degree of alignment that exists, both between these states, and among organizational units and levels. Preliminary findings from both a large national government agency and a local city government suggest that measuring organizational vision and practice, as well as the talent to support that vision, can indeed provide the clear and relevant fact-finding essential for building innovative organizations.

References

Carpenter, Wayne (1991). “Why Good People do Bad Things?” In Forms of Value and Valuation: Theory and Applications, Rem B. Edwards and John W. Davis, eds. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 345-378.

Connor, K.T. (2006). “Assessing Organizational Ethics: Measuring the Gaps.” Journal of Commercial and Industrial Training, 36:3, 148-155.

Connor, K.T. (1996). “16 Styles and What Do You Get? Measuring Entrepre-neurial Talent.” In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Conference. Washington, DC: US Small Business Administration

Davis, Mike (2003). “Building Innovative Bureaucracies: Change, Structure, and the Science of Ideas.” The Public Manager, 32:4, 3-6. Hartman, Robert S. (1991). “The Nature of Valuation.” In Forms of Value and Valuation: Theory and Applications, Rem B. Edwards and John W. Davis, eds. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 9-36.

Published

2009-07-01

How to Cite

Connor, K. T. (2009). Innovation: An Axiological and OD Exploration. Journal of Formal Axiology: Theory and Practice, 2, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v2i.17

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories