Toward a Value Theory Model of Critical Judgment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v10i.155Keywords:
critical judgment, decision-making, leadership, axiological judgment modelAbstract
Judgment is seen as both a core leadership capacity and an essential component of daily cognitive function. Previous studies have emphasized either normative models that stress rational and logical thinking in decision making or descriptive models that emphasize shortcuts in decision making. The purpose of this paper is to suggest an axiological judgment and decision making model following Hartman’s axioms of value. Organizationally, the numerous strategic thinking models that aid in the execution of judgment and decision making (JDM) functions are typically a) one- dimensional in purpose, b) of a two-dimensional linear or matrix style and, c) contextually bound by the specific JDM application. The potential of an axiological model would add value, dimensionality, and utility for multiple applications. To date, few studies have explored the potential for Hartman’s theories and their use in JDM research. This paper argues for an axiological model to augment the fast and frugal heuristics of individual decision-making and strategic thinking employed in organizational leadership.References
Bauman, David. “Leadership and the Three Faces of Integrity”. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 2013, 414-426.
Connolly, Terry, and Beach, Lee Roy. “The Theory of Image Theory: An Examination of the Central Conceptual Structure.” Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Ed. Terry Connolly, Hal R. Arkes, Kenneth R. Hammond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 755-765.
“Elements and Standards of Critical Thinking.” Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2007, http://www.criticalthinking.org/ctmodel/logic-model1.htm
Hardman, David. Judgment and Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives. Wiley-Blackwell: UK, 2009.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Goldstein, Daniel. “Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality.” Psychological Review, 103, 1996, 650-670
Heyler, Scott G., et al. “A Qualitative Study Investigating the Ethical Decision Making Process: A Proposed Model.” Leadership Quarterly, 27:5, Oct. 2016, 788-801.
Jungermann, Helmut. “Two Camps on Rationality.” Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Ed. Terry Connolly, Hal R. Arkes, Kenneth R. Hammond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 575-591.
Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. “Choices, Values, Frames.” American Psychologist, 39:4, 1984, 341-350.
Krogerus, Mikael and Tschäppeler, Roman. “The Decision Book: Fifty Models for Strategic Thinking.” W.W. Norton: New York, 2012.
Peltier, Bruce. The Psychology of Executive Coaching. New York: Routledge, 2010.
Slovic, Paul, et al. “Facts Versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk.” Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, edited by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 463-493.
Sherman, Jeffrey W., et al. “Attentional Processes in Stereotype Formation: A Common Model for Category Accentuation and Illusory Correlation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96:2, Feb. 2009, 305-323.
Smith, Wendy K. “Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes.” Academy of Management Journal, 1015:1, Jan. 2015, 58-89.
Thayer, Richard. “Illusions and Mirages in Public Policy” Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Ed. Terry Connolly, Hal R. Arkes, Kenneth R. Hammond. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 85
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form without prior written permission from the Robert S. Hartman Institute, except as permitted by law.
