Axiological Values In Natural Scientists And The Natural Sciences

Authors

  • Rem B. Edwards

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v15i.178

Keywords:

philosophy of science, value-ladenness, natural sciences, formal axiology

Abstract

This article explains that and how values and evaluations are unavoidably and conspicuously present within natural scientists and their sciences—and why they are definitely not “value-free”. It shows how such things can be rationally understood and assessed within the framework of formal axiology, the value theory developed by Robert S. Hartman and those who have been deeply influenced by his reflections. It explains Hartman’s highly plausible and applicable definitions of “good” and related value concepts. It identifies three basic kinds of value objects and human evaluations of these, and it shows how these should be ranked or prioritized in comparative worth. Finally, throughout, it applies all of the above to what is really going on within natural scientists and their sciences. It shows how anyone, scientists included, should proceed in order to make sense of what and how they value.

References

Edwards, Rem B. The Essentials of Formal Axiology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2010. (A less difficult book than Hartman’s below)

Hartman, Robert S. The Structure of Value. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1967. (A difficult book)

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Edwards, R. B. (2022). Axiological Values In Natural Scientists And The Natural Sciences. Journal of Formal Axiology: Theory and Practice, 15, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.67945/jfa.v15i.178

Issue

Section

Articles